Free China Movement

Evidence · Human Rights · Democratic Future

Take Action

English 简体中文 繁體中文 Français Deutsch Español

🔎

1985–1988 — Fang Lizhi University Speeches and Liu Xiaobo’s 1988 Interview: Primary Texts and Citation Record

A. FACT — Fang Lizhi: biography anchors and the 1985–86 speech inventory

(a) Canonical facts

  1. Fang Lizhi （方励之）, 1936–2012. Astrophysicist; vice-president of the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC), Hefei, from 1984; previously a lecturer who had moved with the university from Beijing to Hefei. [VERIFIED — The Scientist profile; The China Quarterly No. 211 (Sept 2012) appreciation]
  2. 1985–86 lecture tour. Fang gave a series of public lectures at universities — documented stops include Beijing, Shanghai, and Ningbo — on the status of intellectuals, democracy, political and economic reform, and modernization, rather than on astrophysics. [STRONG — Columbia University Press scholarly edition introduction; Fang’s memoir]
  3. January 12, 1987 — removal from USTC posts. Fang was dismissed as USTC vice-president (along with USTC president Guan Weiyan) in a leadership reshuffle. [VERIFIED as the event and month — The Scientist (“In January, Fang was dismissed from his university post”); prior corpus records the January 12, 1987 date]
  4. January 1987 — expulsion from the Communist Party of China. Fang was expelled from the Party as part of the Anti-Bourgeois Liberalization campaign, alongside journalist Liu Binyan and writer Wang Ruowang. [VERIFIED as the event — The Scientist; Index on Censorship (Robin Munro, Oct 1987). Date conflict preserved: Munro’s Index on Censorship account dates both the dismissal and the expulsion to February 1987; the January 1987 dating is used here as the consensus of the other sources. Grade the month CONFLICTING between January and February 1987; grade the event itself VERIFIED.]

(b) Speech inventory (date / venue / topic / grade)

S1. Beijing University, November 4, 1985 — “The Social Responsibility of Today’s Intellectuals” （今天的知识分子的社会责任）.

  • VERIFIED against the scholarly print edition. The excerpts were checked this pass against the Columbia University Press digital edition of Sources of Chinese Tradition: From 1600 Through the Twentieth Century, compiled by Wm. Theodore de Bary and Richard Lufrano, 2nd ed., vol. 2 (New York: Columbia University Press, 2000), pp. 516–517 (Asia for Educators edition, reproduced with publisher permission).
  • Publish-safe quotations (verbatim as printed):
  • “As intellectuals, we are obligated to work for the improvement of society. Our primary task in this regard is to strive for excellence and creativity in our chosen professions. This requires that we break the bonds of social restraint when necessary.”
  • “The reasons for our inability to develop to our [full] potential lie within our social system. Therefore all of us, when considering our social responsibility, should dedicate ourselves to the creation of a social environment that allows intellectuals to fully utilize their abilities and encourages productivity in their work.”
  • “We Communist Party members should be open to different ways of thinking. We should be open to different cultures and willing to adopt the elements of those cultures that are clearly superior. A great diversity of thought should be allowed in colleges and universities. If all thought is simplistic and narrow-minded, creativity will die.”
  • “We must not be afraid to speak openly about these things. It is our duty. If we remain silent, we have failed to live up to our responsibility.”
  • Note: the excerpts are a selection within the two pages (516–517); the full speech text was not obtained. The bracketed “[full]” in “our [full] potential” is the edition’s own interpolation. [VERIFIED]

S2. Tongji University, Shanghai, November 18, 1986 — “Democracy, Reform, and Modernization” （民主、改革、现代化）.

  • Date and venue: STRONG. Fang’s own memoir, The Most Wanted Man in China: My Journey from Scientist to Enemy of the State (Henry Holt, 2016, trans. Perry Link), records: “Things got even tenser at a subsequent lecture at Tongji University on November 18. My topic was ‘Democracy, Reform, and Modernization,’ and thousands of students showed up.” This supersedes the earlier Index on Censorship (Munro, Oct 1987) placement of the speech at “Shanghai’s Jiaotong University” — the memoir distinguishes the Jiaotong seminar (see S3) from the Tongji lecture. Munro’s venue is preserved as the conflicting secondary account (CONFLICTING venue in one secondary source; resolved by the subject’s own memoir).
  • Quotations: VERIFIED against the contemporaneous published article. The Scientist, “Fang Lizhi: Science in the Party’s Shadow” (interview by Angiola Bono, Rome, June 23, 1987; published 1987), quotes “a speech last November to university students in Shanghai” verbatim, and notes that parts of the speech later appeared in The Washington Post:
  • “Men are born with rights to live, to marry, to think, to receive an education, etc. For an individual, this right comes with his birth. And these rights are human rights. Therefore, we should not read human rights as a horrible term. Instead, we should think of human rights, liberty, equality and love as a positive historical legacy. We should first affirm this historical legacy and then strive for democracy. We should not place our hope on grants from the top leadership. Democracy granted from above is not democracy in a real sense. It is relaxation of control.”
  • “When I was abroad, I often explained to foreign friends the tragic experience of Chinese intellectuals during the Cultural Revolution. … ‘Should China have another Cultural Revolution, I hope that we would not become the object of sympathy and be told, “Why have you put yourself in this dilemma again?” It would be tragic if China is to repeat this cycle. The intellectuals should demonstrate the strength they possess.’”
  • Munro’s Index on Censorship version of the same passage (attributed by him to the Jiaotong venue) renders it: “We should not place our hope on grants from the top leadership. Democracy granted from above is not democracy in a real sense. It is relaxation of control.” And he added: “The intellectuals should demonstrate the strength which they possess … We have strength. But the question remains whether we dare to use it.” The substantive wording is consistent across both witnesses; the venue differs (see correction note above). [VERIFIED wording; venue STRONG via memoir]

S3. Shanghai Jiaotong University, November 1986 — “Intellectuals Have Both Duties and Strengths” （知识分子既有义务也有力量） plus a “Particle Astrophysics” seminar.

  • STRONG. Fang’s memoir: at Jiaotong University (where he had been an adjunct professor since 1984) he “gave a seminar for colleagues on ‘Particle Astrophysics’ and then gave a talk to graduate students entitled ‘Intellectuals Have Both Duties and Strengths.’” Exact day in November not given. [STRONG]

S4. Ningbo University, November 1986 — lecture (title not recovered).

  • PROBABLE. Fang’s memoir records the Shanghai–Ningbo trip (“Li Shuxian and I wanted to visit Shanghai Jiaotong University … and Ningbo University”); secondary summaries describe lectures at universities in Shanghai and Ningbo encouraging audiences to “open in all directions,” with audio recordings circulating on campuses nationwide. Title and verbatim text not recovered. [PROBABLE for the visit; UNRESOLVED for content]

S5. Hefei (USTC), December 1986 — speech “a few days before local elections.”

  • ATTRIBUTED. MIT Technology Review (Dec 2018) reports: “In December 1986, a few days before local elections, Fang gave a speech, saying, ‘I do not think democracy is bestowed from the top down. It is fought for from the bottom up.’ Thousands of students protested the next day in Hefei.” Single tertiary lineage; treat wording as attributed, not verbatim-verified. [ATTRIBUTED]

Slogans associated with the 1985–86 speeches (single-lineage summaries; attributed, not verbatim):

  • “Open in all directions” (the phrase secondary summaries use for his call to open to Western ideals of academic freedom, free speech, and free press). [ATTRIBUTED]
  • Constitutional rights should be “actual rights” （实实在在的权利）, not rights on paper only. [ATTRIBUTED]

(c) Official PRC position (as evidenced in contemporaneous official acts and statements)

  • January 1987 dismissals and expulsions. Fang was removed from his USTC leadership post and expelled from the Party; Liu Binyan and Wang Ruowang were likewise expelled from the Party — the Anti-Bourgeois Liberalization campaign’s inaugural personnel actions. [VERIFIED event; month CONFLICTING per §A(a) item 4]
  • Deng Xiaoping’s stated position (attributed via contemporaneous press). The Scientist (1987), citing Beijing Review‘s account of Deng’s remarks to the Central Committee: “We have to take action against those who openly oppose socialism and the Communist Party. … We must resolutely impose sanctions on Fang Lizhi, [journalist] Liu Binyan and [writer] Wang Ruowang, who are so arrogant that they want to remold the Communist Party.” [ATTRIBUTED — press account of remarks, not an official document]
  • Selected writings disseminated for criticism. The 2012 China Quarterly appreciation reports that “500,000 copies of his selected writings and speeches were disseminated to Party branches throughout the country for study and criticism” — the campaign’s paradoxical effect being a wider audience for Fang. [ATTRIBUTED — single scholarly lineage; the compilation’s bibliographic identity not recovered]
  • **Fang’s documented response to the charges (his own words, The Scientist 1987 interview):** “I had never thought or said that we have to achieve ‘the total Westernization of China’ or encouraged students to take to the streets to protest. I was with the students when they discussed, inside the university, democracy and a faster opening up of society, but I tried to stop them when they decided to take to the streets for demonstrations.” [VERIFIED as Fang’s stated position in the interview]

(d) Named-scholar position — the “four principles of academic freedom” exchange (1986)

  • In a 1986 interview with a Chinese newspaper correspondent, later reprinted in the government’s English-language weekly Beijing Review, Fang stated that in a university setting all dogmas must be subject to challenge: “In the university environment, there should be nothing that can only be upheld and that allows no questioning of why it must be upheld. There should be no doctrine that can hold a leading or guiding position in an a priori way.” [VERIFIED wording via The Scientist 1987 reprint; original Beijing Review issue not inspected this pass]
  • Asked whether his “four principles of academic freedom” (science, democracy, creativity, independence) contradicted the Party’s Four Cardinal Principles, Fang responded: “Is it possible that science, democracy, creativity, and independence are in conflict with the Four Upholds? If so, it’s because the Four Upholds advocate the opposite of science, which is superstition; the opposite of democracy, which is dictatorship; the opposite of creativity, which is conservatism; and the opposite of independence, which is dependency.” [ATTRIBUTED — quoted in the 2012 China Quarterly appreciation (footnote 8 cites the interview); wording not checked against the Beijing Review original]

B. FACT — Liu Xiaobo’s 1988 statements: interview venue, documented wording, and the venue-attribution record

(a) The interview: venue established

  • **Jin Zhong （金钟）, “Liu Xiaobo, ‘Black Horse’ of the Literary World” （文坛”黑马”刘晓波）, Emancipation Monthly （解放月刊 — the Hong Kong monthly also rendered “Liberation Monthly”), 1988:12 (December 1988 issue), pp. 59–64.** Jin Zhong was the magazine’s editor. [VERIFIED as a real, dated publication — documented and repeatedly cited by Geremie R. Barmé in “Confession, Redemption, and Death: Liu Xiaobo and the Protest Movement of 1989,” China Heritage Quarterly No. 17 (March 2009), footnotes 3, 19, 54, 113]
  • Venue-claim conflict: RESOLVED. The prior framing (“sourceable is Barmé’s documented November 1988 statement, NOT a verified Liberation Monthly interview transcript”) is corrected by this pass: the two are not in conflict. Barmé’s essay itself documents the Emancipation/Liberation Monthly （解放月刊） interview as a real publication with a precise citation (1988:12, pp. 59–64). What is not yet verified is the verbatim text of the interview against the primary issue — Barmé quotes from it at selected points but the full transcript was not obtained. The remaining gap is verbatim verification, not venue existence. (Note: §T2’s “Xinhua interview transcript” wording was a slip; the venue in question was always the Hong Kong 解放月刊 interview.)

(b) Barmé’s documented November 1988 statement

  • The China Heritage Quarterly essay opens with an epigraph: “There should be room for my extremism; I certainly don’t demand of others that they be like me… I’m pessimistic about mankind in general, but my pessimism does not allow for escape. Even though I might be faced with nothing but a series of tragedies, I will still struggle, still show my opposition. This is why I like Nietzsche and dislike Schopenhauer. — Liu Xiaobo, November 1988” [PROBABLE — Barmé-documented and dated; the footnote sourcing the epigraph was not recoverable from the PDF text extraction. Separately documented: a letter from Liu to Barmé dated November 7, 1988, sent from Oslo, Norway (footnote 106), establishing direct November-1988 correspondence between the two.]

(c) The wholesale-Westernization （全盘西化） statements: wording grades

  • “It took Hong Kong 100 years to become what it is. Given the size of China, certainly it would need 300 years of colonization for it to become like what Hong Kong is today. I even doubt whether 300 years would be enough.” [ATTRIBUTED — widely circulated as a 1988 Liu Xiaobo statement (e.g., The Guardian via secondary republication); commonly ascribed to the 1988 解放月刊 interview. The verbatim wording was not verified against the primary 1988:12 issue in this pass; the statement does not appear in Barmé’s 2009 essay text as extracted. Do not present as a verified quotation.]
  • “To choose Westernization is to choose to be human.” [ATTRIBUTED — reported via The Guardian, secondary circulation; not verified against the interview original]
  • In September 1989, the official press tarred Liu and Fang together as “proponents of national nihilism, national betrayal, and wholesale Westernization” (He Xin’s April 28, 1989 strategy paper to the Central Committee named Liu along with Fang Lizhi as chief instigators of unorthodox thinking; a September 1989 official comment on the protest movement’s “microenvironment” used the “wholesale Westernization” label). [STRONG — Barmé 2009, footnotes 116–117]

(d) Context anchors (FACT)

  • Liu Xiaobo (b. 1955, Changchun); graduated Jilin University Chinese Department 1982; postgraduate at Beijing Normal University; PhD awarded July 1988. [STRONG — Barmé 2009]
  • August 1988: invited to Norway; lectured at the University of Oslo; attended an academic conference. [STRONG — Barmé 2009]
  • September 1986: “Crisis! The Literature of the New Age is Facing Crisis” speech at the CASS Literature Research Institute conference, printed in Shenzhen Youth Daily (October 3, 1986) — Liu’s first national notoriety. [STRONG — Barmé 2009]
  • Liu’s 1988 position as documented: a cultural-nihilist critique of Chinese tradition; rejection of gradualism; advocacy of wholesale Westernization as the path to modernization — distinct from both inside-system reformers and the neo-authoritarian current of late 1988. [PROBABLE — scholarly characterization; exact doctrinal wording graded per §B(c)]

C. LATER OUTCOME EVIDENCE

  1. January 1987: Fang removed from USTC; expelled from the Party; transferred to a research post at the Beijing Astronomical Observatory. (See §A(a).)
  2. January 1989: Fang sent a hand-written note to Deng Xiaoping asking for the release of Wei Jingsheng and other political prisoners — precipitating two open petitions of support. [ATTRIBUTED — 2012 China Quarterly appreciation]
  3. June 5, 1989: Fang and Li Shuxian took refuge in the U.S. Embassy in Beijing following the June 4 crackdown; remained over a year before negotiated departure to the United States. [STRONG — multiple accounts; 2012 appreciation]
  4. 1988–89 arc for Liu Xiaobo: returned to China in 1989; joined the Tiananmen protests; June 2, 1989 “Four Gentlemen” hunger strike (with Zhou Duo, Hou Dejian, Gao Xin); arrested June 1989; detained and denounced in the nationwide press. [STRONG — Barmé 2009; prior corpus]
  5. April 6, 2012: Fang Lizhi died in Tucson, Arizona. [VERIFIED — The China Quarterly No. 211]

D. EVIDENCE-GRADE SUMMARY

# Unit Date / venue Quotation / claim Grade Basis
1 Fang S1 speech excerpts Nov 4, 1985, Beijing University “We must not be afraid to speak openly…” and three companion passages VERIFIED Checked against Columbia UP digital edition, de Bary & Lufrano, 2nd ed. vol. 2, pp. 516–517
2 Fang S2 speech excerpts Nov 18, 1986, Tongji University, Shanghai “Democracy granted from above is not democracy in a real sense. It is relaxation of control.” + human-rights passage + intellectuals’-strength passage VERIFIED (wording) / STRONG (date+venue) Wording checked against The Scientist 1987 article; date/venue via Fang’s 2016 memoir
3 Fang S2 venue correction — Munro’s “Jiaotong University” venue superseded by memoir’s Tongji/Nov 18 account; Jiaotong = the separate “Intellectuals Have Both Duties and Strengths” seminar STRONG Fang memoir distinguishes the two talks
4 Fang S3 Nov 1986, Shanghai Jiaotong University “Intellectuals Have Both Duties and Strengths” STRONG Fang memoir
5 Fang S4 Nov 1986, Ningbo University lecture tour stop PROBABLE Memoir + secondary summaries; title/text UNRESOLVED
6 Fang S5 Dec 1986, Hefei “democracy … is fought for from the bottom up” ATTRIBUTED Single tertiary lineage (MIT Technology Review 2018)
7 Fang dismissal Jan 12, 1987 Removed as USTC vice-president VERIFIED event / STRONG date The Scientist; prior corpus
8 Fang Party expulsion Jan 1987 Expelled from CPC with Liu Binyan, Wang Ruowang VERIFIED event / CONFLICTING month Jan consensus vs Munro’s February 1987
9 Liu interview venue 1988:12, Emancipation Monthly （解放月刊）, Hong Kong Jin Zhong, “Liu Xiaobo, ‘Black Horse’ of the Literary World,” pp. 59–64 VERIFIED (existence/date/venue) Barmé 2009 footnotes 3, 19, 54, 113
10 Liu Nov 1988 statement November 1988 “There should be room for my extremism…” epigraph PROBABLE Barmé 2009 epigraph; footnote not recovered from PDF extraction
11 Liu 300-year statement 1988 (ascribed to the 解放月刊 interview) “…300 years of colonization…” ATTRIBUTED Wide secondary circulation; not verified against primary issue
12 Liu “choose Westernization” 1988 (ascribed to the 解放月刊 interview) “to choose Westernization is to choose to be human” ATTRIBUTED Guardian via secondary republication
13 “Barmé (China Quarterly 17)” citation — Prior-batch citation does not resolve to any located item CORRECTED Sourceable Barmé items: CHQ No. 17 (2009) and the Fang appreciation in The China Quarterly No. 211 (2012); “Xinhua interview transcript” in §T2 was a slip for the 解放月刊 interview
14 Fang–Liu joint official label Sept 1989 “proponents of national nihilism, national betrayal, and wholesale Westernization” STRONG Barmé 2009, footnotes 116–117

E. PRIMARY-SOURCE TARGETS (not found as primary this pass — appended to the claims log)

  1. 解放月刊 Emancipation Monthly (Hong Kong), 1988:12, Jin Zhong, “文坛’黑马’刘晓波” — full interview text; needed to verify verbatim wording of the 300-year and “choose Westernization” statements.
  2. Fang Lizhi, Tongji University, November 18, 1986, “民主、改革、现代化” — full transcript or audio; needed for the complete speech beyond the published excerpts.
  3. Fang Lizhi, Beijing University, November 4, 1985, “今天的知识分子的社会责任” — full speech text beyond the de Bary & Lufrano excerpts; and the 500,000-copy Anti-Bourgeois-Liberalization criticism compilation’s bibliographic identity.
  4. Barmé 2009 epigraph footnote 2 — the exact source of the “There should be room for my extremism” November 1988 statement (candidate: Liu’s November 7, 1988 letter from Oslo).

F. DOWNSTREAM USE NOTE

  • Units 1 and 2 are publish-safe for verbatim quotation with the citations given. Units 11–12 may be used only as attributed circulation (“widely reported as Liu’s 1988 statement; wording not verified against the original”), never as verified verbatim. Unit 13 corrects two prior-batch citation slips — downstream pages should use the corrected citations.