Research transparency
This section explains how Free China Research presents consequential historical questions when evidence is incomplete, conflicting, newly corrected, or still under review. The public pages summarize the evidence for readers while the full canonical research record remains in the archival research system.
Research states
- Verified — sufficiently supported by strong evidence.
- Under investigation — evidence exists, but an important element remains unresolved.
- Disputed — credible sources or testimony materially conflict.
- Corrected — an earlier statement has been superseded or corrected.
- Unverified claim — a claim has been found in a source but is not independently established.
What readers can expect
For major open questions, we distinguish what each source supports from what it does not prove, preserve exact source terminology, show meaningful research updates, and identify the evidence that could resolve the question. We do not silently merge organizational names, titles, or disputed attributions.
Where appropriate, readers may submit historical documents, photographs, recordings, or testimony for archival review. Submission does not make a claim verified; provenance, authenticity, rights, privacy, identity, and claim-level evidence are reviewed before the historical record changes.
Free China 