Public Research Edition — August 2026
The 1946 constitutional settlement developed through several distinct stages: the Political Consultative Conference, the constitutional-drafting review process, later revisions, the Constituent National Assembly, promulgation on January 1, 1947, and preparation for implementation. These stages must not be collapsed into a single act of “joint drafting.”
Cross-party constitutional principles
Contemporaneous evidence strongly supports cross-party negotiation over responsible government, elected representative institutions, provincial/local autonomy, civil rights and nationalization of the armed forces. Communist, Nationalist, minor-party and non-party participants all took part at different stages, but participation in the early constitutional process is not the same as participation in the final National Assembly vote.
Military nationalization
The February 25, 1946 military reorganization agreement and later constitutional provisions show a strong normative chain toward a national, non-partisan military. The final Constitution preserved presidential command of the armed forces, required national defense organization to be determined by law, required the armed forces to transcend personal, regional and party affiliations, and prohibited parties or individuals from using armed force as an instrument of political struggle.
Why the political settlement failed
The research distinguishes the success of completing a constitutional text from the failure to complete a durable joint-government and military-integration settlement. By late 1946, ceasefire terms, military positions, government reorganization, National Assembly procedure and political participation had become interdependent. Limited agreements and unilateral actions occurred, but no credible mechanism synchronized the entire package. American mediation then moved from active settlement design toward withdrawal, while the Executive Headquarters structure survived briefly into 1947 before the American component formally withdrew.
Still unresolved
A narrow primary-source closure list remains for military-constitutional proposals, Ministry of National Defense originals and the direct review/transmission chain into final Articles 36 and 137. These unresolved items are not treated as closed merely because the final constitutional text is known.
Free China 