A Hong Kong court on Friday convicted a 61-year-old retired woman of sedition for displaying flags and slogan sheets at her own Tin Shui Wai flat, and imposed a three-month hospital order requiring her to undergo psychiatric treatment, according to court reporting by Pulse HK News.
Yeung Chiu-ki — whose name has also been romanized as Yang Chau-kei — was found guilty at West Kowloon Magistrates’ Courts of one count of knowingly publishing or displaying a publication with seditious intent, an offence under the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance, Hong Kong’s homegrown national-security legislation enacted under Article 23 of the Basic Law. The case number is WKCC4203/2026.
What the court found
The charge covered the period from 23 March to 4 November 2024 and concerned materials displayed at her flat in Tin Chung Court, Tin Shui Wai — at her front door, on a living-room window facing outward, and in the corridor outside the unit. Court reporting described a colonial-era Hong Kong flag, a Commonwealth flag, and sheets bearing slogans that included calls to expel the Communist Party, a reference to the “five demands” of the 2019 protests, and a well-known 2019 protest slogan.
Chief Magistrate So Man-lung, a national-security designated judge, held that the materials, read together, had a clear meaning: to encourage readers to press their demands and carry on a revolution until the existing regime was overthrown and colonial rule restored, Pulse HK News reported. The magistrate accepted that Yeung was genuinely aggrieved with the building’s security staff, but found the content went far beyond a management dispute. Because the sheets were posted outside the flat, were large, and carried warnings against touching or removing them, the court found she intended them to be seen, and that she knew they carried seditious intent.
Yeung had challenged the proceedings on the basis that the national-security legislation was inconsistent with the Basic Law. The magistrate rejected that argument, holding that the Safeguarding National Security Ordinance was enacted pursuant to Article 23 and has a constitutional and legal basis.
Her defence
Yeung, who represented herself throughout, denied any seditious or display intent. In her own evidence she said the postings were an expression of grievance against security guards at her estate whom she accused of rudeness and misconduct, and that she expected staff to remove them quickly and doubted anyone else could see them. She said the flags at her window were for her own viewing, pointed out that the opposite block is more than 100 metres away, and spoke of her attachment to the former Hong Kong flag. The court did not accept that the display was private or merely a complaint about building management.
The road to the verdict
Yeung first appeared in court on 7 September 2026 and has been in custody since that day. At the first hearing she repeatedly insisted she had committed no crime, and the court ordered two psychiatric reports to assess whether she was fit to plead. Those reports found that she was fit to plead, while recording a diagnosis of schizophrenia with suspected delusional disorder. She pleaded not guilty on 21 September and remained in custody.
Her trial opened on 14 October, when the magistrate found the prosecution had established a prima facie case. She gave evidence on 15 October, and the verdict followed on 16 October.
Sentence: a hospital order, not prison
Instead of a prison term, the court imposed a hospital order of three months, compelling Yeung to receive psychiatric treatment, following the recommendation of the two psychiatric reports, Pulse HK News reported. The court also ordered social-welfare and medical reports to assess the needs of Yeung and her younger son, with whom she lives.
According to the prosecution’s account of her background, reported by Pulse HK News, Yeung has two prior convictions unrelated to this case, was educated to Form 5, divorced in 2000, and previously worked in insurance sales, as a beautician, and as a security guard. In her own mitigation she told the court that she and her son depend on each other and that she lives with osteoporosis, arthritis, and cataracts.
Why this case matters
The conviction is the terminal outcome of a case the Free China Movement has tracked since the trial opened: an unrepresented retiree with a diagnosed psychotic disorder, held in custody from her first court appearance, prosecuted under the Article 23 sedition provisions for flags and slogans displayed at her own home. The verdict — and the court’s reasoning that the combined display was intended to encourage the overthrow of the government — illustrates how broadly the sedition offence now reaches into private residential space in Hong Kong.
Related coverage:
- Chifeng Woman Sentenced to 22 Months for Practicing Falun Gong, Report Says (October 2026)
- Canada’s House of Commons Passes Bill C-219: “Prisoners of Conscience” and Transnational Repression Written Into Sanctions Law
- Taiwan’s Mainland Affairs Council Accuses the PRC (Mainland) of a “New Method” of Transnational Repression
Sources
- Pulse HK News, verdict and sentencing report, 16 October 2026
- HK Court News, trial day-two report, 15 October 2026
- Dimsum Daily, trial opening and prima facie finding, 14 October 2026
- Dimsum Daily, fitness-to-plead hearing and not-guilty plea, 21 September 2026
Reporting note: the verdict and sentence are reported by Pulse HK News, a Hong Kong court-reporting outlet whose earlier coverage of this case (first appearance, psychiatric assessment, trial dates) matches the independently published court reporting of HK Court News and Dimsum Daily on every shared fact. This article attributes the verdict and sentence to that court reporting; all trial-stage facts are corroborated by at least two of the sources above.
Other language editions
This article is also available in Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, French, German and Spanish.